Happy 122nd Birthday, SPGB!

SPGB, founded 12th June, 1904.

The September 1979 issue of the Socialist Standard carried a retrospective of that Journal.

Seventy-five years ago, the first issue of the Socialist Standard was published—a clear statement of the unique socialist case, of uncompromising opposition to the expediencies of reformism:

The greatest problem awaiting solution in the world to-day is the existence in every commercial country of extreme poverty side by side with extreme wealth . . . It is the producer of wealth who is poor, the non-producer who is rich. How comes it that the men and women who till the soil, who dig the mine, who manipulate the machine, who build the factory and the home, and, in a word, who create the whole of the wealth, receive only sufficient to maintain themselves and their families on the border line of bare physical efficiency, while those who do not aid in production – the employing class – obtain more than is enough to supply their every necessity, comfort, and luxury? All the attempted improvements and reforms of governments since then—be they Tory, Labour, Liberal or coalition—have not made any difference. Society is still divided into classes, the haves and the have-nots:. . .  the life condition of the workers is one of penury and of misery. The only saleable commodity they possess  – their power of working – they are compelled to take to the labour market and sell for a bare subsistence wage. The food they eat, the clothing they wear, the houses in which they live are of the shoddiest kind, and these together with the mockery of an education which their children receive, primarily determine the purchasing price of their labour-power.

Today, three-quarters of a century later, these observations are still true. Now we eat soya-bean substitutes in place of meat; we accept that new clothes will fall to bits rapidly or need mending soon after purchase. Some even rely on jumble sales and thrift shops to clothe their children in second-hand reach-me-downs; working-class housing is built on the cheap and nasty principle, heedless of comfort and of a most unappealing ugliness; while the schools our children are compelled by law to attend are no more able to educate them than a battery farm can be said to educate its hens….

What, then, can we do? The answer given by the Socialist Party in 1904 is the same as we would give today, not because we are blinkered slaves to tradition but because the conditions and problems we are dealing with are essentially the same. Our task is. . .  to show the workers that while their organisation in trades will  prove an invaluable aid in the transformation of society by facilitating industrial reorganisation, yet at present they can best help to emancipate themselves from the thraldom of wage-slavery by recognising that in their class struggle with their exploiters they can be most certain of success in the political sphere of action… As in 1904, the SPGB is “a party determined to use its every effort in the furtherance of Socialist ideas and Socialist principles”. We continue to work “gain the confidence and support of the working-class . . . by consistently advocating . . . a clearly defined body of principles”. Then, as now, we assert that “the first duty of The Socialist Party is the teaching of its principles and the organisation of a political party on a Socialist basis”. The first message of the first socialist political party to the working class, with an optimism now embarrassing, concluded:

Men and women of the working-class, it is to you we appeal! To-day we are a small party, strong only in the truth of our principles, the sincerity of our motives, and the determination and enthusiasm of our members. To-morrow we shall be strong in our numbers, for the economic development of capitalist society fights for us, and as, through the merging of free competition in monopoly and the simplification of industry, the personal capitalist gives place to the impersonal trust as your employer, you will be forced to see that the welfare of the people can best be guaranteed by the holding of all material wealth in common.
We ask you, therefore, to study the principles upon which our party is based, to find out for yourselves what Socialism is and how Socialism and Socialism alone can abolish class society and establish in its stead a society based upon social equality. When you have done this we know that you will come with us and, by enrolling yourself a member of The Socialist Party of Great Britain, help to speed the time when we shall herald in for ourselves and for our children, a brighter, a happier and a nobler society than any the world has yet witnessed.
Charmian Skelton

BEYOND SOCIALISM: CONTRIBUTIONISM AND THE WORLD AFTER MONEY (ZOOM)

Event Details

  • Date:

Guest Speaker: Justin Fairchild

Justin Fairchild — founder of the Contributionist movement — argues that socialism and Contributionism share both a diagnosis of capitalism’s failures and a vision of a world beyond scarcity and hierarchy. The difference is in the approach.

To connect to a Zoom meeting, click https://zoom.us/j/7421974305

Watch out Makerfield, you’re about to be conned again!

In the coming UK parliamentary by-election in Makerfield, apart from the two confessed jokers, candidates will all be putting out the same message:

‘Trust me, I have a plan that’s guaranteed to make life better for you’

Some will add a rider that there will be challenges ahead, there’ll be sweat and tears, but in the long run it’ll come right.

The plans will differ slightly, of course, but they will all have this in common – they’ll ignore the inescapable reality of the capitalist system, in which the profits of the minority will always take precedence over any other considerations, precedence over any of the needs or desires of working-class voters.

Socialist Sonnet No. 236

The Incumbent and the Rival

 

An incumbent appears incompetent,

And may be so; but, that is not where

The failing lies. Politicians might dare

To represent some popular dissent,

Loud rhetorical radicals until

The state’s highest office’s siren call.

The prime duty then is to capital;

Profit subordinates the people’s will.

Callous calculation shall determine

Just what any government can afford,

Or if the commonweal must be ignored,

No matter the ballot or who might win.

Choose another, someone else to blame,

A change of curtains, but the view’s the same.

 

D. A.

Dark Paths. How AI, Profit and Power Are Shaping an Uncertain Future

The episode argues that recent developments in artificial intelligence reveal how autonomous AI systems can behave in unexpected and potentially dangerous ways. Using examples such as AI agents tasked with buying paperclips, running online businesses, or handling confidential information, the author describes how these systems often pursue their goals with relentless persistence while disregarding wider consequences. Experiments cited show AI agents breaking rules, leaking sensitive information, engaging in destructive behaviour in simulated environments, and even choosing extreme actions such as nuclear strikes in military simulations. As AI becomes more capable and autonomous, concerns about its reliability and safety become increasingly serious.

AI companies, including those that began with ethical or research-driven ambitions, are pushed by competition, military contracts and investor pressure toward profit-making and strategic advantage. Governments and corporations are prioritising commercial and geopolitical competition over safety, even as researchers warn about risks such as infrastructure failures, cyberattacks and the misuse of powerful AI tools. From a socialist perspective, the deeper problem is the capitalist profit motive, which drives AI down “dark paths”; a society organised around human needs rather than profit would provide a safer framework for developing and using AI.

Taken from the June 2026 edition of The Socialist Standard.

World Socialist Radio is the official podcast of The Socialist Party of Great Britain. We have one single aim: the establishment of a society in which all productive resources – land, water, factories, transport, etc. – are taken into common ownership, and in which the sole motive for production is the fulfilment of human needs and wants.

https://rss.com/podcasts/world-socialist-radio/2889243/

 

 

The Architecture of Autistic Order: WSR

World Socialist Radio
The Architecture of Autistic Order. The Contradictions of Capitalism and the Appeal of Socialism.

In this episode, written by Pablo Wilcox, it is argued that Autistic thinking seeks universal principles and coherent systems, contrasting sharply with the contradictions and unwritten social hierarchies of capitalist society. The author reflects on how, from a young age, he viewed political and social progress as a clear logical trajectory, only to find that many people communicated through ambiguity and shifting expectations. For him, what society labels as autistic “disorder” is actually a commitment to internal consistency and truth.

The essay connects this perspective to socialist theory, particularly dialectical materialism, which Wilcox says appealed to him because it offered a logical framework for understanding injustice through systems and material conditions rather than vague social norms. He argues that capitalism creates chaos through inconsistency, hypocrisy, and unequal application of rules, making it especially exhausting for autistic people who rely on stable logic and fairness. Rather than seeking mere accommodation for autistic individuals, Wilcox advocates for a society organized around transparent and universal principles, where systems function according to their stated values. In this way, he presents socialism not simply as a political ideology, but as a form of social architecture aligned with autistic modes of understanding.

Taken from a forthcoming issue of The Socialist Standard.

World Socialist Radio is the official podcast of The Socialist Party of Great Britain. We have one single aim: the establishment of a society in which all productive resources – land, water, factories, transport, etc. – are taken into common ownership, and in which the sole motive for production is the fulfilment of human needs and wants.

https://rss.com/podcasts/world-socialist-radio/2866387

 

China

In the early hours of 4 June, (1989), soldiers of the Chinese army moved against the demonstrators who had been encamped since the end of April in Tiananmen Square in the centre of Peking. It had been widely expected that there would be a final confrontation between government forces and the students and others who had repulsed previous army attempts to uproot them. But few had anticipated that the army’s action would be so brutal, with tanks and flamethrowers being used on unarmed civilians. Onlookers were cut down indiscriminately with those who attempted to resist. Thousands perished; nobody will ever know how many, as charred and disfigured corpses were hurriedly disposed of and hospitals were overwhelmed by the injured and dying. In the annals of capitalist bloodletting, this day in Peking will hold a place of its own…’

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2009/06/from-july-1989-issue-of-socialist.html

If you were in your late teens or mid twenties thirty seven years ago you would now be only in your fifties or sixties. What do those who participated in the protests in China, in many places not just Beijing, from mid April to early June 1989 remember or feel on the 4th June when the Chinese state finally used the repressive powers at its disposal and squashed the dissent? The figures relating to the number of fatal casualties vary considerably. The goals of the protesters were: democratic and economic reforms; freedom of press, speech, association and ending of corruption in Communist party.

The very first line of the Chinese Communist Party’s constitution declares it is “the vanguard of the Chinese working class”. In reality, the last ruling Communist party of a major country has morphed into a conservative reactionary party bent on preserving the power of state capitalist elites and advancing a distinctly 19th century form of ethno-nationalist imperialism. None of this will be allowed to spoil the festivities as the CCP celebrates the centennial of its founding next month’ (ft.com, 16 June). Above from the Financial Times, quoted in Socialist Standard, August 2021

https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2022/04/rear-view.html

Professor Richard D Wolff, an American economist educated at Harvard, Stanford and Yale, is a fan of the Chinese approach to capitalism. He demonstrates that an ‘elite education’ doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ve learned anything. Any member of the SPGB could quickly properly educate Professor Wolff as to why China is neither communist nor socialist.

Extracted from an interview Wolff gave to Beijing Review: ‘Today, there is a sense of anxiety in the U.S. that the Chinese, over the last 30 years, have figured out a way to outcompete Western capitalism…In China, major private corporations and government sectors exist side by side, but all governed by the CPC. (Communist Party of China) The Party formulates plans with a set of goals that enable private and public resources to synergise. That’s what the West could never achieve…For example, real wages, as in “what an average worker gets adjusted for the prices that have to be paid,” in the U.S. have been stagnant and have not changed much over the last four decades. Yet in China, they have gone up more than four times. Subsequently, the average living standards of the Chinese working class, too, are on the rise…The above accomplishments have resulted in a sense of jealousy and anxiety in the U.S. that the Chinese may have unlocked the secret to the ultimate combination of private and public capital under the leadership of one powerful political party that can achieve socially attractive outcomes—which are not available in the U.S…China has achieved extraordinary growth, growing up from one of the poorest countries in the world to a global superpower second only to the U.S… It seems to me that among all the underlying forces at work, much of the credit for that has to go to the CPC. They made the final decisions about this mixture of private and state-owned enterprises, about how to coordinate them, about how to guarantee they complement one another rather than destroy the other. I don’t see any logic in denying this remarkable deed, or in granting it anything other than admiration…There have been various movements in practising socialism, yet the impact of the Chinese model will prove prominent in the future. The Soviet Union used to be the first successful example as they survived, surrounded by enemies. China is different. What China has achieved as an engine of economic growth is now being studied by every other socialist country trying to seek out the lessons that can be applied to their own national framework.’

https://socialistchina.org/2021/07/21/richard-wolff-on-chinas-rise-to-global-prominence/

Looking forward to retirement?

Workers toil not just to live, eat and raise a family, but also to prepare for retirement by building a pension pot. However, recent reports from the Pensions Commission have argued that fifteen million people in the UK are not saving nearly enough to have a secure retirement, even by the miserly standards of capitalism.

Nearly half of working-age adults are not saving into a pension at all, with just 4% of ‘self-employed’ workers doing so. Future retirees may well be worse off than today’s.

Not only does capitalism dominate people’s working lives, the pressures of daily life also make it much harder to get ready to live comfortably after their days of toil and exploitation are over.